Student-teacher relationship: A Buddhist perspective

by Robert P. Craig

Clearing House

Vol. 69 No. 5 May/Jun.1996

Pp.285-286

Copyright of Clearing House


Teachers often face crisis situations in the classroom, even though at times the teacher may not interpret a particular episode as a crisis (for instance a student's putting her head on the desk). Further, as teachers, we often view a crisis as something negative or bad. In reality, a crisis or a conflict gives students and teachers a unique opportunity--the chance to break out of their habitual personality patterns that block the flow of caring, compassion, and love. A crisis or a conflict is an opportunity to grow in new directions and, thus, to connect more deeply with ourselves and with life itself. Buddhist Psychology According to Buddhist psychology, which emphasizes consciousness, mindfulness, and awareness, to find a solid foundation for relationships we (in our case, teachers and students) need to consider what we most value in our connection with someone we care about (Beck 1993). What are the moments in a relationship we most cherish? Perhaps we answer, "When I feel loved," or, "When I really feel seen and understood." Yet, what is really happening at those times? In such moments we become more fully present and thus taste the richness of our being. We no longer have to prove anything. Something in us relaxes, and our usual cares and distractions fade into the background. We feel more aware, more awake, more alive. Like many spiritual traditions, Buddhism views our daily experience as a path. Our connection with people we care about and love, our students, can be one of the best vehicles for growing on the path. But in order for the path to unfold, relationships must become conscious, not merely implied or suggested. Being conscious of the student-teacher relationship of caring, compassion, and love helps us to develop greater awareness, depth, and spirit. Students and teachers discover a larger vision (at least "larger" than their own ego needs) and purpose that can help them persevere on the days when nothing seems to go right. The more students and teachers are open to one another, the more they (and all of us) begin to encounter obstacles that stand in the way of that openness. According to Buddhist psychology, these obstacles and inhibitions arise from all those habitual patterns of resistance, avoidance, and denial that we have developed as ways of coping with painful circumstances in our past (Beck 1993). Change and renewal only occur when we are aware of the myriad ways we shut ourselves down in the presence of others--the particular ways we "wear a mask" so as to avoid being hurt again (Craig 1994). Buddhist psychology emphasizes nonduality (Beck 1993). That is, becoming more human involves working with the totality of who and what we are--both our openness to others and our imprisonment in the concepts and behaviors we use to avoid pain and hurt. Buddhist psychology asserts that although we are all conditioned by our society and culture, the basic nature of the human heart is unconditional caring, inquisitive intelligence, and openness to reality. Thus, students and teachers have these two forces at work: an embryonic sense of caring, commitment, and love that wants to blossom, and the imprisoning weight of our past fears, anxieties, and hurts. If either side of a student's or teacher's nature is emphasized to the exclusion of the other, that person cannot move forward in relationship in any meaningful way. If, for instance, the student is stuck in the "bliss trap"--imagining that the teacher is a surrogate parent who will solve all life's problems and eliminate all the student's fears and limitations--attachment is formed. Becoming too attached to anything, according to Buddhist psychology, leads to rude shocks and disappointments, such as, in this case, when the student is forced to deal with real-life relational challenges. Another distortion in the student-teacher relationship is the "security trap." For instance, if a teacher tries to make a relationship with a student serve the teacher's needs for friendship (or any other form of security), the teacher loses the sense of the greater vision of both education and relationship. Neither of these traps constitutes a path. Neither of them really goes anywhere. They both sustain illusion and a false sense of relationality. Caring, compassion, and love are transformative powers. For instance, love brings two sides of the teacher or student--the expansive and the contracted, the awake and the asleep, the aware and the unconscious--into direct contact. Rigid places within us that have been hidden from view due to our hurts and fears awaken. We can choose to soften them or to let them remain hardened. Without this awareness, no choice is possible, and the student-teacher relationship suffers because of hidden, nonconscious scars. From a "stuck" perspective, such as the bliss trap or security trap, the student-teacher relationship seems frightening, for it forces both student and teacher to face things (negative psychological states, attachments) they would rather not look at. The relationship between a student and teacher can help free both from hidden entanglements by allowing each person to see exactly how and where he or she is stuck. We must not imagine that we can get rid of all the difficulties that inevitably arise in relationships or think that, if we could just "get it right" with life and relationships, we could finally get on with "the real stuff." The student-teacher relationship is the real stuff. Because a relationship is always a living process, never a finished product, new questions, obstacles, and challenges continually arise; they are there to help us keep growing. The difficulties we have with intimacy, caring, and compassion become not so much obstacles as an integral part of love's path. A Classroom Process A process that I have found useful to help students and teachers learn about their inner obstacles to the student-teacher relationship is the following: 1. Ask the students to think of some person, thing, or situation they would like to avoid. Tell them to pay special attention to their physical reactions to what is being imagined. 2. Ask them to write their reactions down and to name their techniques of avoidance or nonacceptance of whatever they imagined. 3. Have the students describe this process in a journal, which only the teacher reads and may decide to comment on. 4. Then ask the students to think of some thing, event, or person in their lives that they are grateful for. It could be a person one loves, a sense of well-being, something beautiful, or a wonderful thing that happened. 5. Invite the students to vividly create this valued thing in their imaginations, to savor whatever they have chosen to recall. 6. Ask them to imagine that this person, place, thing, or situation is a language that is telling them something. Have the students write down (in a journal, perhaps) what they learned from the language, how it spoke to them. Ask them to notice and to write down how their body feels when they are in a mood of acceptance and how this differs from how they felt when asked to think of something they try to avoid. 7. Have the students share any of their experiences or what they wrote down, or have them keep a journal in which they essentially do the same thing. We find this process beneficial in that it is holistic--making use of body, mind, memory, and imagination. And, for some reason still mysterious to me, such a process, even if merely kept in a journal and read only by the teacher, usually increases trust within the classroom. Students become more free to share, to honestly and authentically participate in the class. The source of this increased trust may be greater awareness on the part of teacher and students of the obstacles and blockages that exist in relationships. Conclusion Satachidananda (Kabat-Zinn 1994, 54) wrote: You can't stop the waves, but you can learn to surf. Students and teachers can't stop the thoughts, feelings, and memories that thwart interrelationship. Yet, the Buddhist perspective discussed here is a way for them to "learn to surf," to learn about the waves--the blockages and obstacles that inhibit relationship. Through awareness, the waves become vehicles for stronger, more viable relationships. REFERENCES Beck, C. J. 1993. Nothing special: Living zen. San Francisco: Harper-Collins. Craig, R. 1994. The face we put on: Carl Jung for teachers. Clearing House 67(4): 189-91. Kabat-Zinn, J. 1994. Wherever you go there you are: Mindfulness meditations in everyday life. New York: Hyperion.