Book ReviewThe Buddha: A Short Biographyby John S. StrongReviewed by Jessica Main Faculty of Religious Studies, McGill University H-Buddhism Copyright 2003 by H-Net <http://www2.h-net.msu.edu/> |
John Strong's _The Buddha_ stands out among literary and
academic works on the life of Sakyamuni Buddha. Strong targets
non-specialists and assumes little or no background knowledge. He provides a
road map through the literature on sacred biography within Buddhist studies.
This makes his analysis of the Buddha's life strikingly different from the many
other popular biographies, such as Karen Armstrong's _Buddha_ (2001). Strong's
prose is smooth, which enables him not only to explain clearly the difficult
imagery and concepts embedded in the many biographies of the Buddha but also to
introduce technical information of interest to academics.
This book's target is "the 'student' rather than the 'scholar'" (p. xiii). Even
though it is a challenging introductory text for a
first-year college or university course on Buddhism, it convinced me that
biography and narrative can be powerful teaching tools.
Strong begins with a concise description of the history of scholarship on the
Buddha's life that stretches from the late
nineteenth century to the present. Then, he contrasts these academic portraits
of the Buddha with "tales that have been
remembered and revered, repeated and reformulated" (pp. 1-3) by practitioners of
Buddhism throughout its history. Avoiding a
strictly factual search for the "historical Buddha," Strong provides "a middle
way between remythologizing and demythologizing, between myth-making and
history-making" (p. 3). He discusses the human, contextual, and rooted parts of
the Buddha's life as well as the supernatural and mythical ones.
Next, Strong shows how the Buddha's biography simultaneously reveals and
reinforces the wider dimensions of Buddhist artistic production, ritual,
doctrine, and history. In a series of brief sections, he describes the
reciprocal relations that link the life story of the Buddha, the practice of
pilgrimage, and the worship of relics (pp. 6-10). Strong describes the ways in
which sacred biography, art, and ritual reinforce each other. These sections
orient readers toward specific events in the stories themselves: gathering the
Buddha's future relics after his extreme austerities, such as his milk-rice
bowl, hair, and throne (p. 68); the symbols and chronology of the ordination
ritual, which are reflected when young prince Siddhartha leaves behind his
ornaments, undergoes tonsure, and exchanges his ornate clothes for austere robes
(p. 60); the earth goddess's wringing her hair and creating a flood as mirrored
by the water-pouring rituals of Southeast Asia (p. 72); and the later growth of
monasticism and monastic rules of conduct as prefigured in the Buddha's
teachings about the proper use of "bowls, robes, and rooms" (p. 102). Events in
the story explain the ritual, and ritual invokes events in the story.
Although doctrine is not his central focus, Strong is able to explain some
difficult Buddhist ones by examining these stories.
The Buddha himself, in his second sermon, directly and systematically explains
the _skandhas_, arguing that they are not
the self and, indeed, that there is no permanent and unchanging self at all (p.
84). Characters demonstrate the doctrines of _karma_ and rebirth (pp. 16-19).
Events epitomize the ten perfections (p. 27). Moreover, Strong shows how the
very nature of the Buddha's biography might itself suggest doctrine. The
"blueprint" of the Buddha life stories--the structure and sequence of events
that all Buddhas adhere to--transcends and encompasses any historical
individual, becoming a common journey to awakening. According to Strong, the
Mahayana doctrine of the _dharmakaaya_ is analogous to this impersonal and
abstracted blueprint and might even have been suggested by it (p. 14).
Strong makes a serious attempt to expand biography beyond the one-life
paradigm. He includes material about both what preceded the Buddha's birth as
Prince Siddhartha, and what followed his death as the Awakened One. The Buddha
expands the linear and authoritative style of biography, moreover, by presenting
parallel versions as summaries and excerpts. Beginning with the Jataka tales in
"Previous Lives of the Buddha," Strong covers the Buddha's "Ancestry, Birth, and
Youth," "Quest and Enlightenment," "Teachings and Community," "Daily Routines,
Miracles, and Distant Journeys," and ends with his "Final Days, The _Parinirvana_,
and the _Nirvana_ of the Relics."
All of Strong's discussions--the history of scholarship, the ritualistic and
historical dimensions of the Buddha biography, and
the diverse stories themselves--are complemented by a thorough index and
glossary of Pali and Sanskrit terms along with an excellent annotated
bibliography. The latter makes this book very useful to scholars of sacred
biography and Buddhist studies.
It is apparent throughout that Strong effectively marshals the results of
earlier scholarly projects, and makes them accessible to
students.[1] Particularly important is the sophisticated collaborative volume
_Buddhist Sacred Biography in South and
Southeast Asia_, edited by Juliane Schober, to which Strong contributed "A
Family Quest: Rahula, Yasodhara and the Bodhisattva in the _Mulasarvastivada
Vinaya_ and Related Traditions." _The Buddha_ builds on this volume as a whole,
cleverly distilling many of its important scholarly and methodological
contributions. I would like to point out two of these contributions: one on
previous lives of the Buddha (_Jatakas_) and the other on the many versions of
his biography.
Although Jataka literature is very important in the vernacular storytelling
traditions of Buddhist Asia, it is unusual to find it
in biographies of the Buddha. Strong includes a discussion of many of the
Buddha's previous lives: the Buddha as King Dasaratha in a reworking of the
_Ramayana_ (p. 16), as the perceptive boy Somanassa (p. 17), as the Brahmin
Sumedha (pp. 21-23), as the princess Purana (p. 26), and as the prince
Vessantara (pp. 29-31). The Buddha's previous lives explain how an individual
begins on the path to Buddhahood. They show the spiritual heights of his life
before being born as the prince Siddhartha, and the meritorious acts and immoral
deeds committed in the incalculable interim. In the Jataka stories, events do
not always unfold the way that they did during the life of Sakyamuni Buddha, nor
are all characters at the same stage of spiritual development. Strong shows how
the past lives of the Buddha give his present life "karmic depth" (p. 17),
adding complexity to relationships between the Buddha and his mother, his son,
and his cousin, Devadatta. The Jatakas, Strong argues, demonstrate the arduous
process of spiritual perfection that a bodhisattva must undertake to become a
Buddha. But they also demonstrate the Bodhisattva's imperfections. Strong
describes these as a list of the Buddha's unwholesome deeds in his previous
lives
(pp. 33-34). The balanced treatment and interesting contrasts make _The Buddha_
highly readable as a middle path between historical and mythical descriptions of
the Buddha.
In contrast to academic bibliographies based on Sanskrit and Pali sources or
creative biographies by ancient and modern Buddhists, Strong's book is not
linear. He successfully interweaves many versions of the Buddha's biography in
order to expose "the complexities of the biographical process" (pp.
xii-xiii).[2] Strong describes the sacred biography of the Buddha in three
layers:
fragments, autonomous scriptural stories, and vernacular traditions (pp. 4-5).
These layers are given equal weight throughout the text, as Strong consciously
avoids favoring one side of the dichotomy between either early and late or
canonical and vernacular. The particular sources of his alternative versions are
not clearly noted (although they are carefully referenced in the notes), which
might at first appear to be a weakness in his book. But this creates seamless
movement from one version to the next, bringing a richness to the stories. And
this approach allows Strong to bring forward poignant narratives that are
markedly different from the linear, canonical accounts most often read by
students of Buddhism. Good examples of these are the stories in which Yasodhara
parallels the Buddha's ascetic progress (p. 58) or Queen Maya thinks that her
son is dead (p. 64). By refusing to identify his sources explicitly at every
occurrence, Strong allows his narrative to flow more smoothly than a rigorously
documented text--a tactic appropriate both for readability and for his method.
Readers are not given a chance to categorize each story before reading it.
Overall, it is a very refreshing effect.
My critiques of this work are minor, dealing with terminology and the use of
this book in a classroom setting. Strong creates several terms. Some, such as
"centripetal Buddha" and "centrigual Buddha" (pp. 121-122), are highly
successful, interesting, and easy to remember. But others are controversial,
confusing, or obscure. For example, he uses the term "collective karma," which
has acquired a loaded meaning among modern Buddhists in connection with the
karma of a "society" or "nation" as a whole. Other terms, such as "nexus,"
might better capture the karmic depth across lives and karmic relations among
lives (p. 18).
Strong uses the words "karmalogical," "cosmological," and "dharmalogical" to
describe knowledges of the awakened Buddha (pp. 74-75). "Dharmalogical"
knowledge refers to reality as-it-is. There are three doctrinal possibilities
that describe reality as-it-is,
depending on each version of the story: cutting off the influxes (_asravas_),
the four noble truths, or dependent origination (p.
75). "Karmalogical" knowledge refers to the Buddha's insight into his own
previous lives. And "cosmological" knowledge refers to his insight into the
previous lives of all other beings. These words, however, are easily confused
with the three important and necessary super-knowledges that he discusses
immediately before them (p. 73). Strong's use of language, here, adds nothing to
clarity.
As I have already observed, Strong suggests the word "rupalogical" for the
physical dimension of the Buddha's relics (p. 147). The use of this word is just
one of many ways in which he brings out "somatic"--the bodily, physical, or
embodied--parts of the Buddha story. For example, Strong talks about three
_nirvanas_: the extinction of the _asravas_, of the body (_parinirvana_), and of
the relics (p. 126). His premise that _nirvana_ has a strongly physical
dimension is seldom encountered in Buddhist studies. Instead, the latter
stresses knowledge or insight of enlightenment. Strong's focus on somatic
expressions of the Buddha's enlightenment is interesting but obscure; more
important features are myth, ritual, and art (pp. 63-64, 141).
In using Strong's work in a classroom setting, I foresee some obstacles. I have
already noted that his presentation of many
stories is a great strength of _The Buddha_; unfortunately, this approach
assumes some general knowledge of Buddhism. If students need lectures and
additional reading material to benefit from _The Buddha_, this decreases its
usefulness as an introductory text. On the other hand, if Strong responds to
this difficulty by prefacing his work with a basic outline of the life story--a
brief summary of the stories discussed under "Quest and Enlightenment" for
example--it would defeat his stated aim of presenting parallel life stories in
all their richness and variety. Although a simple linear preface would enable
first-time students to enter the historical, academic, and methodological
complexities and comparisons discussed in Strong's introduction, it would defeat
his purpose of presenting the complexities of the Buddha's narrative. This is a
perennial problem in teaching religions. How can teachers provide a
sophisticated and nuanced view of Buddhism from the very beginning? Strong's
work does not solve this problem, but it does offer us a new choice. Although
both teachers and students might have more difficulties at first, Strong's
nuanced and complex work is preferable to a single linear story.
To conclude, introducing students to Buddhism through story could be quite
effective. Strong's book presents an excellent and
academically rigorous portrait of the Buddha, which is nonetheless accessible
and highly readable. His method, the "middle way," is successful. And his
treatment retains the complexity of the many versions of the Buddha's life
story. Strong balances early and late stories, canonical and vernacular sources,
and describes both the historical and the supernatural character of the Buddha.
This book, though within the popular genre of biography, has far greater depth
than its competitors.
Notes
[1]. For example, _Guide to Buddhist Religion_ (Boston: G. K. Hall, 1981); _The
Experience of Buddhism_ (Belmont: Wadsworth, 1994 and 2001); and several
contributions in _The Encyclopedia of Religion_ (New York: MacMillan, 1987).
[2]. Strong refers to Alfred Foucher's _The Life of the Buddha According to the
Ancient Texts and Monuments of India_ (1963); and E. J. Thomas's _The Life of
the Buddha as Legend and History_(1927).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.