p. 107 In 1914 I was studying ancient Buddhist art in Slam under the kind patronage of the Royal Siamese government.(l) In Bangkok-on-Salarei, a resting-station at Wat Prakeo, my attention was attracted by a Buddhist statue that fascinated me by its incomparable beauty and which, on account of the softness of its handling had to be attributed not to Siamese, but to Indian workmanship. Its expression bore the greatest resemblance to a seated Buddha in Sarnath of the Gupta period, of which Vincent A. Smith in his History of Fine Art in India and Ceylon (p. 120), after speaking of the Western influence on Indian art, says, "this statuary presents nothing distinctly Roman or Hellenic, unless it be the refined restraint above mentioned, which is not quite Indian. Can it be that in the Gupta age some forgotten sculptor of genius succeeded in absorbing the Greek spirit into Indian forms? Who can tell?" In reality, however, the statue was far more beautiful than the one described by Smith. It was full of life and motion, traits which are, indeed, not foreign to Greek and post-Alexandrian art, yet occur also in the deepest, purely Indian representations, as, for example, in the representation of Siva. in the Deogarh Temple or the incomparable Kapila in Anuradhapura. The statue, of which I made a pencil-sketch at the time, has since then repeatedly stimulated my imagination. In 1925, during a rest-period in my work, I sent the sketch to the best art connoisseur in Siam, H. R. H. Prince Damrong, with the request to look up the statue and to have photographs made and sent to me, no easy task, considering the countless quantities of statues decorating the temples in Bangkok. Prince Damrong kindly carried out my request; he immediately found the statue and had photographs forwarded to me, which I here publish for the first time. Prince Damrong informed me that he himself had seen the statue in Sarnath during a trip abroad, that he had acquired it, and in 1892 presented it to the king of Siam. The statue represents Buddha, advancing from a huge halo, with the left knee slightly raised for a forward step. just as though this were the prototype of the representation of Buddha pacing through the universe, so popular in the later Gupta age. i The right: hand is opened with a welcoming gesture (the left arm unfortunately has been broken off) and the slender body shows the typical Indian hip-modelling. The head is slightly inclined toward the front, and the mouth with its hardly perceptible smile, breathes serenity and human kindliness. On the two shoulders the garment is indicated. A simple neck-band encircles shoulders and chest; there is a classical delicacy in the treatment of the abdomen, which swells slightly from under the tightly drawn apron; there is an unsurpassable calm in the parallelism of motion produced by the tilted head and raised left arm. I do not hesitate to assert that this statue can be justly compared with the greatest achievemrnts of Indian art, namely those of the Kapila in Anuradhapura, the Siva and Parvati in Elephanta, or the Siva Nataraja of Polonnaruva. Through this opportunity, which unfortunately has been long postponed because of official work, I take special pleasure in expressing my thanks to Prince Damrong, for placing this masterpiece once more within reach of' those interested in the great period of Indian art. ___________________ 1 Ueber alt-buddhistische Kunst in Slam, Ostasiatische Zeitschrift, Jahrgang V/VI, Heft 1/4 and 1/2. 2 A. Salmony, Sculpture in Slam, p. 54.