In the Mirror of Memory: Reflections on Mindfulness
and Remembrance in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism
Reviewed by Richard Sherburne
The Journal of the American Oriental Society
Vol.114 No.1 (Jan-March 1994)
pp.139-140
COPYRIGHT American Oriental Society 1994
This collection of essays offers a thorough exploration of Buddhist
notions of memory (smrti), showing the diverse . modes and uses of
memory in both the fundamental religious practices of mindfulness,
with attendant shades of meaning, and the Buddhist description of
memory as storehouse of past events in its epistemological and
phenomenological senses.
Working with the sparse references to memory in Buddhist literature,
the eleven contributors, the finest English-writing Buddhologists of
our day, as well as the penetrating American philosopher, Edward S.
Casey, have investigated many facets of mnemonic phenomena, as
orchestrated by the editor, Janet Gyatso, who has capitalized on the
specialization and expertise of each. Several of the essays
represent extensive funded research over several years.
Donald S. Lopez, Jr., explores the Buddha's memory of infinite past
lives, treating this phenomenon as one of the superknowledges
(abhijna) of bodhisattva yoga practice, and makes interesting
comparisons of Buddha-memory with Freud's "screen (selective)
memories."
Padmanabh S. Jaini reflects on the absence of Buddhist smrti in
lists of mental events in Sanskrit Abhidharma literature, and the
apparent avoidance of its definition, lest Buddhist non-self
teaching be attacked.
Nyanaponika Thera also notes the omission of memory in Theravadin
Pali lists of dhammas, describing how and why memory is ascribed to
the perception (samjna) aggregate, and likewise remarks that this
obviates questions regarding the foundations of Buddhist
no-self/impermanence teachings.
Collett Cox treats the practice of mindfulness, so basic to Buddhist
meditational exercises, and various terms for its development, from
early Buddhism up to Sarviistivadin Abhidharma description.
Paul J. Griffiths shows how classical Indian Yogacara accounts for
Buddhas' recollection of their past lives, interpreting such memory
as actually present-active contemplative vision, rather than recall
of past events.
Alex Wayman makes a comprehensive investigation of all Buddhist
terms for recollection and other types of memory, introducing the
Buddhist logicians' view of mundane memory as unreliable, and how it
is viewed as a hindrance since it is part of discursive thought
(vikalpa).
Rupert Gethin comments on the Buddhist memorization lists (matika),
their importance as reminders for mindfulness, which also provide
the practitioner with a creative realization of dharma's total
structure.
Janet Gyatso, the editor, has a splendid exposition of the function
of memory/mindfulness in the use of the dharans sounds and letters,
as the most succinct reminders of basic truths or teachings, thus
identifying the practitioner and his sublime content. She compares
one Tibetan Tantric author's description with the semiotic theory of
the American philosopher, C. S. Peirce.
Paul Harrison addresses the implications for memory of commemoration
and identification in the practice of "mindfulness of the Buddha"
(Buddhanusmrti), demonstrating how commemorative visualization is
calculated to bring about "psychical incorporation," identification,
with the recollected deity.
Matthew Kapstein develops an excellent analysis of mnemonic practice
in the Great Perfection (rdzogs-chen) tradition of Tibet.
Enlightenment awareness itself is based on a reflexive return of the
mind to an original experience of the ground of existence.
Meditative mindfulness is, of course, the necessary process by which
one eliminates the build-up of delusion that has obscured the
original experience. He illustrates the thesis with a translation of
the "Amnesic Monarch and Five Mneniic Men."
Phenomenologist-philosopher Edward S. Casey offers reflections on
all the Buddhist presentations with analogies found in modern
Western understandings of memory involvement.
All contributors address common themes about the relationship
between mindfulness, present perception, and recollection of the
past, as well as different positive and negative views of the
exercise of memory in practice. As the editor, Janet Gyatso, notes,
the present investigations have been only from Indian and Tibetan
sources, and much remains in the rest of the Buddhist writings.
However, the present work should add momentum to future efforts to
refine contextual meanings of smrti in Buddhist materials.