.
p.105
In 1912 Professor C. Formichi published a new
(Italian) translation of this grand poem of
A`svagho.sa, with introduction and critical notes.
This work was
_____________________________________________________
(1) [The death of Professor Speijer while this
article was passing through the press is a matter
for profound regret, and not less on account of
his personal qualifies than of the eminent
services which he had rendered, and might still
have rendered, to Sanskrit and Buddhist studies.
An
p.106
reviewed in the ZDMG. for that year (Ixvi, 517-19) by
Professor E. Leumann, with whose praise and
blame--for his appreciation was of mixed character-I
fully agree. In some respects Professor Formichi's
translation marks a progress since Cowell; yet in
many a case he is in the wrong, as will appear to any
scholar who takes the trouble to compare both.
The appearance of a new book on the Buddhacarita
induced me to read the poem carefully over once more.
As a small fruit of this perusal I offer to the
readers of this Journal some new proposals for
emending corrupt passages. Some of them presented
themselves to my mind in this iterata lectio; others
I have taken from my previous marginal notes. Boni
consulas, benevole lector!
First of all, I would draw attention to a large
gap in canto I, which, I believe, has until now not
been observed.
The passage I, 35-45, describes in detail the
rejoicing of all classes of beings, Devas, Naagas,
etc., at the birth of the Bodhisattva in his last
existence, and points out the manifold tokens of
honour and worship which they bestow upon the holy
child. This description not only ends abruptly, but
in the next verse (I, 46) the reader is on a sudden
transported to a quite different stage. He finds
himself, without the slightest hint of this
transition being supplied by the poet, a hearer of
the answer given by the learned Brahmans to
`Suddhodana, concerning the destiny of his son. This
verdict of the naimittikas
_____________________________________________________
obituary notice is printed below. After perusing
in MS. and later in proof my respected friend's
contribution, I had intended to examine and
report to him the evidence of the Tibettan
version in regard to the critical points which he
here discusses; and I had indeed the satisfaction
of announcing to him the confirmation by that
version of his suspicion of a gap after verse i,
45. I have examined also the other passages which
he discusses, and in one or two cases I am
recording the result in notes. To do more would
hardly be of advantage, as in a future re-edition
of the text both that version and Professor
Speijer's notes will no doubt be taken into full
consideration.--F, W. T.]
p.107
comes to a conclusion in verse 51. It is, moreover,
very unlikely, not to say impossible, that verse 46
should be its exordium. The sentence which begins yad
raaja.caastram, etc., cannot be understood as the
preamble of a speech uttered by counsellors to their
king; it evidently belongs to a substantive part of
that speech, the illustration by examples of a
general rule which is laid down--probably also laid
down a second time--in verse 51. The previous part of
the answer must be lost.
That there must be a gap between the verses 45
and 46 necessarily follows also from another
consideration, The very wording of verse 52,
etc., demonstrates that
those Brahmans are not mentioned here for the first
time, but must have been introduced in a former
portion of the canto. How can the pronoun tai.h,
be otherwise accounted for? Formichi translates
"i suoi brahmani ", as if the text had
:instead
of (1) 
Cowell avoids the difficulty by writing
" the brahmans ".
Having become convinced of the existence of a
considerable gap between I, 45 and 46--and is it not
in itself extremely improbable that A`svagho.sa
should have passed over the convocation of the
brahmans by the king and the reason of that
convocation, and how he addressed them, putting them
questions?--- I consulted vol. xix of SBE., which
contains Beal's English translation of the Chinese
version of the Buddhacarita. And at once I realized
that a large portion of the Chinese text is missing
in the tradition of the Sanskrit text, from about
verse 32 apud Beal (p. 6) to verse 56 (p. 10). There
can, I think, exist little doubt that the contents of
this portion (the conclusion of the miraculous
phenomena; Maara's grief; the attitude of `Suddhodana
and Maayaa; the naimittikas'(2) observation of the
superhuman signs on the
________________________
(1) He does so tacitly.
(2) Of course a number of them, though Beal from his
Chinese source mentions only one Brahman.
p.108
body of the child; and the first part of their
verdict), be they ever so unreliable in detail, must
have formed part also of the original text, when
still intact. This missing portion makes up about
twenty-four stanzas of the Chinese. Assuming the
proportion of the number of verses between the
Sariskrit text and the same text in Chinese garb to
be nearly the same as in the preceding thirty-two
verses of the Chinese, which correspond to
thirty-seven Sanskrit ones (Chinese, I,
l-32=Sanskrit, I, 9-45), about twenty-eight stanzas
may have been lost between I, 45 and I, 46.(1)
In the following I venture to propose some new
emendations:-
I, 43. Better than by the reading of Bohtlingk
and Kielhorn
the text will be
amended thus:
The celestials
and the atmospherical divine beings are always
represented in the sky, and the parallel passage
signalized by Leumann and quoted by Formichi has the
selfsame turn. I conjectured thus many years before
knowing the note of Leumann.(2)
III, 14.
What is here the meaning of
? Cowell
translates "in the stir of the news ", Formichi
" all'udire la notizia", though v.rttaanta by itself,
without some verb of arousing or hearing added,
cannot of course convey this meaning. It simply
means the "news" and nothing more. Yet Cowell
realized that the poet must have expressed somehow
that the ladies put on their ornaments in a hurry. It
is, however, a mistake made: by the translators that
they attributed that signification to
__________________
(1) [The Tibetan version confirms Professor Speijer's
view, showing at this point about seventeen
additional verses.--F. W. T.]
(2) [The Tibetan supports vanam.--F. W. T.]
(3) I have adopted here the correction of Luders
:.
p.109
vinyasta. The verb vinyasyati is here = Latin
disponit; it does not imply the idea of sa.mbhrama
and "haste" That such a bhaava is likely to be
described by Asvagho.sa is deer; but it is not in the
word vinyasta that we have to seek for the adequate
term indicating the agitation of the matrons anxious
to contemplate the prince passing. The fact is that
the expression of the haste is hidden under the
corrupt 
. The genuine reading must be
.The ladies went down from their apartments,
having put in their different places (
)the
ornaments (
) which they had taken up
(
)in a hurry at random, the first they could
get (
),as they had no time to make a choice.
Vrthaa has here its old meaning, which is akin to
that of Latin temere, Greek, and which is instanced
" by passages from the Satapathabraahma.na
(
) in the St. Peter- sburg Diet., s.v.
(1)
III, 48. The Bodhisattva, has come home from his
second drive outside his palace grounds in a sad and
meditative frame of mind. The king seeing him thus
returning (
), and having
heard what nimitta occasioned that melancholy mood,
acts as is explicitly stated in the stanzas 49 and
50. But how the king came to know that nimitta we do
not read in our text. Instead of this we are informed
that the king "entered the city (himself)" (Cowell),
"si reco in citta"(Formichi)=
This entering of the city by the king, who has not
before been said to have left his capital, is not
only out of place, but. also inconsistent with his
having seen(
)his son come back. Moreover, tile
wording itself,
,to express his coming
into his capital, is strange and suspect. Instead of
I propose 
as the true reading. The
old king, ta.m (prek.sya sa.mniv.rttam, made an
inquiry, parye.sa.na.m calcaara; thereby he learns
of the nimitta and acts
_____________________________________________________
(1) [The Tibetan has, however, gnas-lugs-gtam-gyis =
---F. W. T.]
p.110
acccordingly. The Chinese version of our poem (verse
236 on p. 35 of Beal's translation) has likewise
"asked anxiously the reason why ", but knows nothing
of that returning of the old king to his capital. I
guess that the source of tile depravation of
parye.sa.na.m into puryaagama.m is to be,sought in a
misspelt 
(1)
IV, 38.
I do not wonder that 
as edited by
Cowell, is disapproved by scholars. Cowell's
interpretation of that word is strained. But neither
, the conjecture of Bohtlingk, nor Formichi's
proposal to read 
are satisfactory. The
genuine reading cannot, I think, be but
; I
adopt aak.rtyaanucakaaraasya, etc., with the meaning
"she imitated him by (assuming his)outer appearance".
AAk.rtyaa is the instrumental of aakrti of the kind
instanced in my Sanskrit Syntax, 73. Cf. Raghuva.mca,
xi, 13.
IV, 52.
I am not satisfied with 
. This word
disturbs the construction of the whole sentence,
whether it is taken as the nominative case or as
the accusative. Formichi, as well as Cowell,translat-
ing here rather freely,does not solve the difficulty,
and will scarcely be followed in his effort to
account for the ,genitives viha.ngaanaa.m and cinta-
yata.h by making them dependent on the verb aa +dhaa.
In his note on p. 335 of his book he seems to explain
cintayatas cittam as a so-called accus. etymologicus,
which is of course impossible.
By a, slight correction, reading
instead
of
,all will become right. Construe: api naama
viha.ngaanaa.m
_____________________________________________________
(1) [Tibetan yo.ns-su-gros-byas-so = a compound with
pari (probably parye.sa.na) made
consultation.--F. W. T
p.111
(citte) vasuntena mada aahitah, na tu cintayato
janasya citte? "should Spring infuse love's
drunkenness into the mind of the birds and not in
tile mind of the being endowed with reason and
holding himself for wise?"
IV, 56. 
must be corrected into
.
Youth (yauvana) is mentioned in the preceding line,
Old age (jaraa) not so. If we keep jareya.m, the
reading of MSS., tile pronoun iyam cannot be
accounted for, whereas idam (viz. yauvanam) is the
very pronoun Wanted. II. read the whole stanza as
follows:--
" how is it that these women do not realize the
ficklenessklenessss of youth, since, may it be ever
so adorned with beauty, old age will ruin it?"
IV, 92. 
, etc. I doubt the genuineness
of There is no room here for a concessive particle,
IV, 92. yadi. The prince must mean: "and as regards
your assertion that with females it is allowed to use
untrue speech, I do not understand," etc. In other
terms, 
' is a clerical error for
Cowell, indeed, translates "and when thou sayest",
not "if". V, 22. Kielhorn was right in stating that
the second paada, 
, as
found in the MSS. and edited by Cowell, must be
somehow corrupted, since the object of pravivik.su.h
cannot be wanting. His correction 
does not
satisfy. The adversative particle
, introducing
wha follows in paada c, shows that the prince by
going to the town and not to the forest had changed
his mind. How, then, can it be said in the preceding
line that lie mounted on horseback with the intention
of going to tile town? On the contrary, the prince,
under the strong impression of the miraculous
appearance of the monk, had made up his mind to
betake himself to the forest (cl. 21d). Yet
: (the true
p.112
reading is here proposed by Luders), he did not
follow his inclination, and, putting off that design
until a later time (
), he returned
into the town. Hence it follows that Asvagho.sa
cannot have expressed himself but thus:
" he mounted on horseback,
in order to enter the forest".(1)
V, 58. 
The upamaa contained in the fourth paada, is
differently understood by Cowell and Formichi.
According to Cowell the a.nganaa in question is
a(nother) woman "crushed by an elephant and then
dropped"; Formichi explains the word as denoting a
female elephant, subdued (bhagnaa) by a, male
elephant and thrown to the ground. Both
interpretations are to be rejected, since they would
involve the highly improbable, not to say impossible,
assumption of a simile borrowed, not from ordinary
and common things, but from something unusual and
farfetched. Moreover, in the interpretation of
Formichi the descriptive part of the rhetorical
figure, as it is elaborated in the paadas a, b, and
c, fails to have its effect. ~ithiliiIculamuurdhajaa,
etc., suits the female musician; how can it be
explained to fit the female elephant? We have rather
to expect that the girl, lying on the ground with
dishevelled hair and her ornaments sliding down from
their places, should be compared to some creeper,
trampled down by the feet of an elephant and crushed.
Accordingly I suppose "taa.nganeva to be corrupt, and
confidently emend 
.
VII, 12. The first word of this stanza,
,
can be accounted for neither as a conclusive particle
nor as a pronoun. In fact, both translators leave it
out in their
_____________________________________________________
(1) [The Tibetan has gro.n-la = puram.--F. W. T.]
p.113
translations. I suspect its genuineness, and read the
first paada as follows: 
Apuurva, not puurva, is the very word wanted: "it is
the very first time I Flee an hermitage; for this
reason," etc.
VII, 13. Cowell has edited:
following the Paris MS.
The Cambridge MS. has 
Considering
that the prince wants to be informed of t he various
kinds of tapas (the 
of st. 11), and
that after the detailed general exposition of tapas
in st. 14 there follows an account of the
-- note the plural
tapasaam-- the true reading must surely be
The ascetic, in fact, does
not praise the excellence (vise.sam) of the tapas,
but commemorates the manifold kinds (vise.saan) of
it .(l)
VII, 43.
Cowell retains in his edition this reading of the
MSS., and translates: "to dwell with thee who art
like Indra would bring prosperity even to
B.rhaspati." This interpretation seems to me better
than Formichi's, who takes abhyudaya as meaning the
same as udaya, "arising," a rather arbitrary opinion,
which makes him render the line thus: "ii dimorare
con te che sei simile ad Indra farebbe di certo
sorgere un (secondo) B.rhaspati." Far-
fetched,indeed!
I suppose a slight fault. We have but to replace
the bh in abhyudayaa by the ak.sara t, which is so
similar to it in Nepalese MSS., and we get-
" to dwell with thee, who art like Indra, would bring
a source of delight (even) to B.rhaspati." The
sub-audition
_____________________________________________________
(1) [The Tibetan has khyad-par-rnams = vise.saan--F.
W. T.]
p.114
of 
cannot be a hindrance to the emendation,
in poetry.(l)
VIII, 49. 
Cowell translates: "Do not therefore assume that
his departure arises from the fault of either of us,
O queen!" Formichi likewise: "Pero, o regina degli
uomini, non voler credere che la partenza di lui
avvenne per colpa di noi due." The purport of the
sentence is in this manner well rendered, yet the
interpretation is anything but exact. It rests on the
assumption that pratigantum pratyetum, " to believe";
but since there does not exist, as far as is known,
another instance thereof, Cowell himself supposed a
corruption in pratigantum and proposed pratipattum.
But neither this nor any other correction of the
transmitted ak.saras is required. They are sound and
genuine. The awkwardness of interpreting them arises
from a wrong division of words; 
in fact, is
not one word, but two. Read 
(if not
as is in MS. C) 
,and construe: naarhasy
aavaa.m do.sato gantu.m tatprayaata, m.(or prayaati.m)
prati, "do not therefore inculpate us in' this manner
for his departure." Do.sato gantum = duu.sayitum.
Raamaaya.na, ed. Bomb., vi, 105, 13:
As to prati
cf.Buddhacarita, xiii, 16:
VIII, 54. Formichi declares the first line of
this stanza to be inexplicable and a locus
desperatus; he does not even venture to translate the
stanza. My opinion on this point is quite different.
Not only does the purport of the verse seem clear to
me, but I think also that it has been faultlessly
transmitted by tile MSS. There is no reason to change
with Cowell
(a weld, moreover, indispensable for
the sentence) into
to avoid to construe
_____________________________________________________
(1) [The Tibetan mnon. par. mtho. ba supports
abhyu-F. W. T.]
p.115
with tile accusative. Though that construction looks
somewhat strange, it is unobjectionable. Why, when
nobody will find fault, with a turn like this,
anarhaa vasundharaa ta.m patim, " Earth does not
deserve him as her ruler," should one be everse to
such a one, where anarhaa is replaced by abhaagini?
The objective accusative with verbal norms in "in is
sufficiently proved as good Sanskrit; cf. Whitney,
Sanskrit Grammar, 271b, my Sanskrit Syntax, 52, and
Raam., ed. Bomb., i, 6, 19:
(1)
IX, 32. The prince, justifying his retirement
from the world, says that he would not have left his
family and relatives, if separation from them were
not something unavoidable. In the half-sloka which
contains the second member of the alternative, "
since separation is unavoidable, for this reason,"
etc., there is a gap of three syllables filled up by
Cowell. I should prefer to fill it up otherwise. In
my opinion, Asvagho.sa's text may be better restored
by reading the stanza as follows:-
is my conjecture for
, and in the
that follows I recognize the mutilated first
syllable of 
. Our poet greatly likes the
repetition of the same wording in both members of al-
ternative and adversative sentences.
IX, 38. Leaving aside the paadas a and b, where
the Bodhisattva, refuting the prejudice that only old
age is the proper time to forsake the world, just as
in the foregoing and following verses he repeatedly
employs the terms kaala and akaala--which verses
owing to their corrupt and fragmentary condition I do
not understand-I think I might propose a plausible
correction of paadas
_____________________________________________________
(1) [The Tibetan seems to omit VIII, 54.--F. W. T.]
p.116
c and d, which contain an independent sentence. By
reading sarvakaale for sarvakaalaa, and changing the
nonsensical subsequent ak.saras
into
we would get a line that runs thus:--
"Death drags away the living at every time. Is, then,
not every time fit for (striving at) the Highest Good
?"(1)
IX, 56. The reader of Cowell's translation of
this stanza must be struck by the self-contradiction
of the view expressed. Liberation is first promised
as attainable by the line of precepts laid down in
st. 55--vie. the discharge of one's debts to the
Ancestors, the Rsis, and the Devas--and immediately
after it is said: " those who seek liberation will
find (nothing but) weariness." The translation of the
edited text is here, indeed, good; but the original
cannot possibly have this purport. It is clear that
the king's counsellor must mean this: " Pay your debt
to the Pitaras, the Rsis, the Devas; by these means
you will obtain salvation; those who seek for
liberation in some other way do not get it, may they
exert themselves ever so." In other terms, the second
line of st. 56 is to be read thus:-
XII, 19. The emendation 
in paada, a,
proposed by Windisch, cannot be upheld, as it spoils
the metre. From the transmitted
of C, I rather
elicit 
and
of cl. 18 is to be understood
also in 19. Araa.da teaches here that the eleven
indriyaa.ni and their vi.sayaas are modifications of
buddhi.(2)
_____________________________________________________
(1) [The Tibetan confirms this translation. It also
, implies a probable reading, in the
previous line.--F. W. T.]
(2) [The Tibetan mkhyen. mdzod agrees with Professor
Windisch.--F. W. T.]
p.117
XII, 22.
There is here no room for such a word
. as
The different phases of individual existence are
here enumerated, and "being bound" is not one of them,
but the very essence of any such existence at all. It
is not badhyate that is here required, but baadhyate.
Birth (jaayate) and its triad of undesirable yet
unavoidable consequences--old age (jiryate), pain
(baadhyate), and death (mriyate)--are styled vyaktam,
"the material world," the same idea in Buddhist
terminology being also denoted by the term
drstadharma, Pali ditthadhammo, cf · Childers, s.v.
For this reason I confidently read
Asvagho. sa
uses the same word also in another passage: XIV, 27.
XIII, 29c.
a deeper darkness
of night spread around (Cowell). This must of course
be meant. It is, however, scarcely admissible to
assume for vitarati the acceptation "to spread about".
Kern corrected. 
To this may be objected the
improbability of the parasmaipada having here an
intransitive sense. I should therefore, while
keeping
,prefer to read
"Night intensified her spreading out (her veil of)
darkness." Note that the visarga after 
is not
found in C.
XIII, 33. Both Cowell and Formichi are at a loss
to extract a good sense from the first and second
paada of this stanza:
etc. How can the genitives dharmavidas tasya denote
the Bodhisattva signified by the subject maharsih ?
If the reading is right, they cannot but designate
another than that subject. This conclusion is so
imperative that - Formichi even sough to demonstrate
that sa dharmavit should be Maara himself! But the
reading is not right. Several emendations have been
proposed, see Formichi, p. 397 f. Here is one more
which, if probable, would
p.118
heal the wound in a very simple manner. I would,
then, propose:
(if not
,with Bohtlingk)
etc. "But the Great Rsi, knowing the Dharma and
invincible (as he was), when he perceived the host
of Maara overflowing...." Ast.rta, ('invincible," is
a Vaidik word, indeed; but this is no reason why
Asvagho.sa should not have made use of it. There are
other instances of such words found in his poems,
which in the Petropolitan Dictionary are only
exemplified by passages taken from Vaidik texts;
for instance, Buddhacarita, II, 54,
(ovserved);
II, 36, 
(gold); VIII,82, 
(fixed); the
archaic meaning of "resting " of
,V, 46. Cf. also
my note on III, 14.(1)
_____________________________________________________
(1) [Tibetan chos-kyi-cho-ga seems to imply a reading
dharmavidhes.-- F. W. T.]